After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures throughout Europe, fresh technologies have become reviving these systems. Via lie recognition tools tested at the border to a system for verifying documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of solutions is being used by asylum applications. This article is exploring just how these solutions have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. This reveals how asylum seekers are transformed into obligated hindered techno-users: They are asked to comply with a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and to keep up with unstable tiny within criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their particular capacity to work these systems and to go after their right for security.
It also displays how these types of technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They assist in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering them from being able to view the stations of safety. It further argues that analyses of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight into the disciplinary www.ascella-llc.com/counseling-services-for-students mechanisms of technologies, by which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects exactly who are self-disciplined by their reliability on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal expertise, the article argues that these technology have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double impact: even though they assist to expedite the asylum procedure, they also generate it difficult pertaining to refugees to navigate these systems. They are really positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions created by non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their conditions. Moreover, that they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.